[Fwd: [ubl-ttsc] suggestions for scenarios]

[Tim McGrath <tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au>]

 as per my action item, here is the draft set of scenarios i sent to the
tools and techniques team in response to their use cases/compliance document.

i would like to build this into the 'customization paper' as a basis for
different types and levels of UBL adoptions, so i would appreciate comments
for the LC team.

-------- Original Message --------

Subject:	[ubl-ttsc] suggestions for scenarios
Date:	Wed, 21 Jan 2004 02:41:57 +0800
From:	Tim McGrath <tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au>
To:	ubl-ttsc@lists.oasis-open.org

i am trying to simplify and clarify the different scenarios noted in the 
compliance discussions.  i intend to use these for the position paper of 
customizing UBL, so i would like feedback from this group..

my list currently reads....

1. Entity A sends entity B a UBL document that satisfies a normative UBL 
document schema.
2. Entity C sends entity D a UBL document that satisfies a normative UBL 
document schema but that has been customized by tighter restriction.
3. Entity E has generated a set of components and schema they want to 
call 'UBL XYZ' and have it viewed as a normative UBL document. 
4. Entity F wishes to generate a set of components and schema using UBL 
NDRs and some existing UBL components but not have it viewed as a 
normative UBL document.  
5. Entity G wishes to use some existing UBL components in their business 
vocabulary but not have it viewed as UBL.

-- 
regards
tim mcgrath
phone: +618 93352228  
postal: po box 1289   fremantle    western australia 6160




To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl-ttsc/members/leave_workgroup.php.


-- 
regards
tim mcgrath
phone: +618 93352228  
postal: po box 1289   fremantle    western australia 6160