Re: [ubl-lcsc] Proposal for revised use of Representation Terms forsome BBIEs in UBL 1.0 draft 1

[Tim McGrath <tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au>]

i agree with stephen's decisions.

however, this will impact on existing implementations as it chnages UBL Names.
 so, if we agree to this we need to make it clear to the ISC.

Stephen Green wrote:

As mentioned on the last conference call, I'd like to
propose some revisions to the usage of Representation
Terms in the existing UBL model (1.0 draft 1)

These are:

 

Recommended:		From	To	Reason/Notes
LineItemCountQuantity		Quantity	Numeric
AllowanceCharge. MultiplierFactorQuantity		Quantity	Numeric
CardAccount. Holder		Text	Name	definition reads “the name of the holder...” and compare to FinancialAccount. Name
PaymentTerms. SettlementDiscountRateNumeric		Numeric	Percent	definition reads “the ... discount (percentage)”
PaymentTerms. PenaltyDiscountRateNumeric		Numeric	Percent	As above
TaxCategory. RatePercentNumeric		Numeric	Percent	definition reads “the tax rate as a percentage”
Maybe:
Item. PackSizeQuantity		Quantity	Numeric	definition reads “the number of items in a pack”
PhysicalAttribute. DescriptionID		Identifier	Code	definition reads “... from a formalised list”
CardAccount. CV2		Text	Identifier	Definition reads “The CV2 identity...”

Thanks

Steve

-- 
regards
tim mcgrath
phone: +618 93352228  
postal: po box 1289   fremantle    western australia 6160