[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: Use of CCT's
Forgot to copy this to the UBL list ajs ---------------------- Forwarded by Alan Stitzer/NYC-NY/US/Marsh/MMC on 28 Feb 2004, 07:31 Saturday --------------------------- Alan_Stitzer on 28 Feb 2004, 07:30 Saturday Please respond to un-cefact-tbg17@listman.disa.org@Internet To: un-cefact-tbg17 cc: un-cefact-tbg17 (bcc: Alan Stitzer) Subject: Re: Use of CCT's Actually....according to what TBG17 has in "Communication. Details", phone number is text. We will be sending out a spreadsheet later this week with candidate ACC's which we are considering for release. I am not able to send it out at this time. ____________________ Alan Stitzer AVP Marsh USA Inc. 1166 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036-2774 Phone: (561) 743-1938 Fax: (561) 743-1993 Internet: Alan.Stitzer@marsh.com ____________________ <<< Memo from blantz@attglobal.net@Internet on 27 February, 2004, 07:59:02 PM Friday >>> blantz@attglobal.net@Internet on 27 Feb 2004, 19:59 Friday Please respond to un-cefact-tbg17@listman.disa.org@Internet To: un-cefact-tbg17 cc: (bcc: Alan Stitzer) Subject: Re: Use of CCT's I think phone number is an Identifier. MK ----- Original Message ----- From: "CRAWFORD, Mark" <MCRAWFORD@lmi.org> To: "UN/CEFACT TBG17 - Harmonization" <un-cefact-tbg17@listman.disa.org> Cc: <ubl-lcsc@lists.oasis-open.org>; <un-cefact-tbg17@listman.disa.org> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 7:24 PM Subject: RE: Use of CCT's let me 1) think about it for a couple of days 2) check with the UBL LC to see what they have done, and 3) ask TBG17 who is doing the CEFACT implementations to see if I can capture a consensus. ________________________________ From: Lisa M. Shreve [mailto:lshreve@comcast.net] Sent: Fri 2/27/2004 6:58 PM To: CRAWFORD, Mark Subject: Use of CCT's Hi Mark, Some of our groups continue to struggle over which CCT to use, under different circurstances. One that came up recently is phone number. While it is a number, it clearly is not numeric, not a quantity, not a measure --- I would say that Text is the right choice. But, I don't see anywhere that I can point to, in order to produce a rule. So, first, do you agree that Text is the right CCT? Second, can you help me with the rule -- I've got my TAS hat on ... Thanks, lms --- You are currently subscribed to un-cefact-tbg17 as: blantz@attglobal.net. To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-un-cefact-tbg17-51920M@listman.disa.org --- You are currently subscribed to un-cefact-tbg17 as: Alan.Stitzer@marsh.com. To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-un-cefact-tbg17-51920M@listman.disa.org To: un-cefact-tbg17@listman.disa.org@Internet cc: (bcc: CN=Alan Stitzer/OU=NYC-NY/OU=US/OU=Marsh/O=MMC) From: blantz@attglobal.net@Internet --- You are currently subscribed to un-cefact-tbg17 as: Alan.Stitzer@marsh.com. To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-un-cefact-tbg17-51920M@listman.disa.org To: un-cefact-tbg17@listman.disa.org@Internet cc: un-cefact-tbg17@listman.disa.org@Internet (bcc: CN=Alan Stitzer/OU=NYC-NY/OU=US/OU=Marsh/O=MMC) From: Alan_Stitzer/NYC-NY/US/MARSH/MMC@MPOWER
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]