Re: [ubl-lsc] Scheduling the end of the review cycle

[Tim McGrath <tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au>]

sounds fine to me.  obviously whilst we are working with liaisons and 
gathering input we shall continue to refine and expand our methodology 
to improve such things as the definition of context.

I would like to come out of the London plenary with the material for UBL 
version 1.0 (OASIS Committee Spec.)

Jon Bosak wrote:

>LSC and CSC,
>
>We've spent a lot of time talking about the beginning of this next
>review cycle, but not much time thinking about the end date.  We
>need to establish this now before we make a public announcement.
>
>The goal, of course, is to have all the input organized and ready
>for processing by the beginning of the UBL TC meeting in London on
>28 April.  Anne Hendry has committed to creating and regularly
>maintaining an issues log as the inputs come in, but knowing how
>these things go, we can expect most of the feedback to come in
>right at the end.  Working backward from 28 April and figuring in
>some time to distribute a finished issues list to the members far
>enough in advance for them to have it in hand before setting off
>for London, Anne and I reckon that the list needs to be out to the
>TC members on Monday 21 April, and that therefore the deadline
>needs to be no later than Monday 14 April.  This would make for a
>review period of exactly 12 weeks (20 January to 14 April).
>
>Does this make sense to everyone?
>
>Jon
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------
>To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
>manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
>
>  
>

-- 
regards
tim mcgrath
fremantle  western australia 6160
phone: +618 93352228  fax: +618 93352142