[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-ndrsc] MSXML and Parser List
At Monday, 12 November 2001, Doug Bunting <dougb62@yahoo.com> wrote: >Mike, > >I believe the action item I took was to test msXML with respect to its XML >Schema conformance. I haven't started on that but my tardiness is unrelated >to the issue you raise. > >It's important that we make a rational choice when placing this parser on >our priority list, deciding how much weight we want to give its feature set >in our guidelines. Am I correct in thinking you'd like msXML to be >relatively high in the list? Thanks for clarifying the action item. Yes, I think msXML needs to be relatively high on the list. ------------------------------------- Mike Rawlins, Rawlins EC Consulting www.rawlinsecconsulting.com =end of email===
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC