[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Bill&Eve's proposal on local/global elements
At Tuesday, 29 January 2002, Dale McKay <dale@drmckay.net> wrote: >Just a note: If anyone has any new CCT's, now would be a good time to bring >them up. I'll put in my 2 cents worth for having one CCT per Representation Term. A one-to-one correspondence (or one-to-one and onto,i.e., isomorphic, if you want to be complete about it) is a lot cleaner and better defined than the many-to-one CCT to RT relathionship in the spec as it stands. ------------------ Michael C. Rawlins www.rawlinsecconsulting.com =================================================================== Texas Metronet ===================================================================
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC