OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ubl-ndrsc message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Subject: Re: [ubl-ndrsc] MINUTES: 19 Feb 2003


The roll call should say:

Eduardo Gutentag - Yes

On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 10:04, Lisa-Aeon wrote:
> 1.  Roll Call and Welcome from the chair (Lisa), assignment of
> co-chair to take minutes.
>  
> Bill Burcham - 
> Mavis Cournane -
> Mark Crawford - Yes
> Fabrice Desré - Yes
> Arofan Gregory -
> Jessica Glace -
> Michael Grimley -
> Eduardo Gutentag -
> Eve Maler - Yes
> Sue Probert- Yes
> Lisa Seaburg - Yes
> Gunther Stuhec -
> Paul Thorpe -
> Kris Ketels - Yes
> Ann Hendry - Yes (observer)
> Jon Bosak - Yes (observer)
> Jim Wilson - Yes
>  
> 2.  Acceptance of minutes - No quorum so not accepted.
>  
>     Feb 12, 2003 
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl-ndrsc/200302/msg00056.html
>  
> 3.  Adoption of agenda/schedule planning - Discussion and added a few
> items.
>  
> 4. Discussion of the proposed NDR UBL 1.0 release:
>  
> Plan is to work in Word, convert to Open Office for publishing,
> provided that it does not hurt the schedule.  If there are problems,
> Open Office staff would be willing to help.
>      
> Lisa's Action Item: email list regarding schedule.
>  
>      
> 5. Review priorities and assignment of work items (Mavis/Lisa/Mark)
>  
> Lisa's Action Item:  Put out new priority list.
>  
> 6. Update on Context Methodology (Eduardo)
>  
> There no real changes, have sent document out to group.  Comments from
> Mark, have questions and will discuss with him.  
>  
> 7. Embedded documentation (Gunther/Mavis)
>  
> It is agreed, there are three things that need to be discussed and
> decided:
>  
> 1.  What is the content of the documentation?
>  
> 2.  How much of the content do we include?
>  
> 3.  Format of the documentation within the schema?
>  
>  
> Discussion Points:
>  
> We discussed regurgiating the information in the spreadsheets in the
> schema.  This is our current position.
>  
> We had originally discussed using XHTML, we have no formal decision
> standing.  This is also our current position and what went out in the
> 0p70 release from LCSC.
>  
> How is should go into the schema?
>  
>  Jon:  XHTML gives workable text there.
>  
> What content should be in the documentation?
>  Jon: I feel we should have enough to be perfectly clear in a semantic
> way.  Our LCSC experts need to have a hand in this decision. 
> Everything Gunther is talking about deserve to be put out, but does
> not belong in the schema.  My suggestion to LCSC is to create a extra
> column in the spreadsheets to list some of these outsides things.
>  
>  
> We discussed having a run time schema and an annotated version. We
> have not made any decisions.  We would have 3 things:  Runtime schema
> (stripped out), annotated schema, then fully annotated and fleshed
> out.  
>  
> Eduardo:  The only thing we have to do is produce the annotated
> schema.
>  
> Proposed Decision:  We will produce an annotated schema.  The
> annotations will be the information currently required by Section 7 of
> the CCTS 1.90 as supplemented by necessary information identified by
> LCSC.  
>  
> A separate proposal needs to be put for the documentation format.  We
> have several choices, XHTML, DocBook (Gunthers).
>  
> 8. Code List Rules Paper and Code List Module (sent out 2/18/03)
>  
> Module document:
>   http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl-ndrsc/200302/msg00065.html
>  
> Working Draft:
>   http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl-ndrsc/200302/msg00066.html
>   
>  
> Other Business:
>  
> Ed:  during face to face, we discussed redefinition, can anyone
> remember why we did?  
> Ev:  this came from our risk analysis of schema features from the very
> beginning.
> Ed:  Should we look into it now?  What we have been calling
> Polymorphism.
> Ed:  Redefinition can not be parsed without error.
> Ed:  Suggestion is two fold - lets ask Danny Vint about why he was
> using this.
>  
> AI:  Eduardo to send out an email to Danny Vint
>  
> Local vs. Global - 
>  
> Jim:  Have not heard back from Gunther.  His proposal should be the
> trigger.
>  
> Jon:  Ask him to call Gunther.
>  
>  
>  
> 9.  August Meeting - please send in your preferences!
>  
> 10. Adjourn (11:35am)
> 
>  
>  
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Lisa Seaburg
> AEON Consulting
> Website: http://www.aeon-llc.com
> Email:  lseaburg@aeon-llc.com
> Alternative Email: xcblgeek@yahoo.com
> Phone: 662-562-7676
> Cellphone: 662-501-7676
>  
> "If you obey all the rules, you miss all the fun."
>                        -Katharine Hepburn
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 
>  
>  
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.441 / Virus Database: 247 - Release Date: 1/9/2003
-- 
Eduardo Gutentag               |         e-mail: eduardo.gutentag@Sun.COM
Web Technologies and Standards |         Phone:  +1 510 550 4616 x31442
Sun Microsystems Inc.          |         1800 Harrison St. Oakland, CA 94612
W3C AC Rep / OASIS TAB Chair



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Powered by eList eXpress LLC