Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Documentation Proposal

[Tim McGrath <tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au>]

is the annotated schema additional to the normative schema (no annotations)
or are you suggested just one?  if it is one, can we still call it normative?

also, (nit pick) if this is to an NDR rule it may be better to say the explicit
title rather than the section number in CCTS and also (presumably) we would
want to say...

"required by Core Component Registry/Repository Storage as defined in the
current CCTS".

Lisa-Aeon wrote:

The following proposal came out of the NDR call today.  This is an email vote, please email back to the list with comments or proposed changes to this.  If I do not hear back from anyone I will assume this is acceptable.

 

Proposed Decision:  We will produce an annotated schema.  The annotations will be the information currently required by Section 7 of the CCTS 1.90 and supplemented by necessary information identified by LCSC. 

 

Lisa

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Lisa Seaburg
AEON Consulting
Website: http://www.aeon-llc.com
Email:  lseaburg@aeon-llc.com
Alternative Email: xcblgeek@yahoo.com
Phone: 662-562-7676
Cellphone: 662-501-7676

 

"If you obey all the rules, you miss all the fun."
                       -Katharine Hepburn
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.441 / Virus Database: 247 - Release Date: 1/9/2003

-- 
regards
tim mcgrath
fremantle  western australia 6160
phone: +618 93352228  fax: +618 93352142