[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Naming conventions of business documents?
I believe we have a rule about this, but it's very vague and just talks about reflecting the "business process". If it makes sense, we could get more specific (but if we recommend a tripartite name with dots, people might confuse it with CC names! :-). Eve Stuhec, Gunther wrote: > Hello all, > > I have a question to the naming conventions of the name of business > documents´. > > Every name of business documents exists of three parts: > > - Object: PurchaseOrder, Invoice, DeliverySchedule, etc. > - Method: Transfer, Create, Update, Delete > - Activity: Notification, Query, Response, Collaboration, > Negotiation, Request, Confirmation > > How can we assembly this three parts in names business documents? Like: > "Create. Delivery. Notification" > Is the name of the generic header the same as the name of the business > document? > Do some rules existing now? Do we assembling like that: Method. Object. > Acitivity? > Should we use for the activity verbs or nouns? > Are the terms "Object", "Method" and "Ativity" enough or too much? > Do you have another suggestions? > > It would be very glad, if you can help me. > Thank you very much. > > Kind regards, > > Gunther > -- Eve Maler +1 781 442 3190 Sun Microsystems cell +1 781 354 9441 Web Technologies and Standards eve.maler @ sun.com ---------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]