RE: [ubl-ndrsc] Containers

["A Gregory" <agregory@aeon-llc.com>]

Lisa:

Give the outcome of the global-vs.-local debate, and the fact that we have
more than one doctype per namespace, i suspect we will need to adopt a
convention that, instead of using “Head”, uses “[doctype]Head” or similar.

Cheers,

Arofan

-----Original Message-----
From: Lisa-Aeon [mailto:lseaburg@aeon-llc.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2003 9:35 AM
To: UBL-NDR
Subject: [ubl-ndrsc] Containers


Our discussions of containers in London brought forward the following
proposal.  No one at the meeting disagreed on this point.  Do we need to
continue the discussion, or pass to Mark for inclusion into the NDR Main
document?

Lisa

Proposal:

 1.  All documents shall have a container for metadata  and which proceeds
the body of the document and is named  "Head" _____________. (anything but
header)

 2.  All elements with a cardinality of 1..n, (and lack a qualifing
structure) must be contained by a list container named  "(name of repeating
element)List", which has a cardinality of 1..1.


++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Lisa Seaburg
AEON Consulting
Website: http://www.aeon-llc.com
Email:  lseaburg@aeon-llc.com
Alternative Email: xcblgeek@yahoo.com
Phone: 662-562-7676
Cellphone: 662-501-7676

"If you obey all the rules, you miss all the fun."
                       -Katharine Hepburn
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.474 / Virus Database: 272 - Release Date: 4/18/2003