[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Fw: [ubl-lcsc] ccts Annotation Structure (fwd)
I would agree on this issue. With or Without documentation it is (or at least should be) the same schema with the same validation results. So here I would agree that one namespace applies. Where I have problems with one namespace is for my usage - where I might only want to bring in the UBL code lists or UBL basic data types (those re-usable pieces) because I would want to use them in my own schemas for a vertical industry that doesn't do much with PO's and order management. I would also like to get to some of the common things like address and party without having the whole UBL universe imported into my environment. I want selective reuse and I don't know how to do that when there is one namespace and one file. ..dan At 10:34 PM 7/2/2003 +0100, Anthony B. Coates wrote: >** Reply to message from "Burcham, Bill" <Bill_Burcham@stercomm.com> on Wed, 2 >Jul 2003 16:02:30 -0500 > > > I agree with Chee-Kai on this one, it is wrong to have A and A' schemas. I > > cannot represent Eduardo's viewpoint effectively, so I won't try. > >I'm not exactly sure what you mean by A and A' Schemas, but I assume you are >referring to the earlier discussion on whether it was appropriate to have two >versions of the same Schema - one with annotations and one without - and apply >the same namespace URI to both. My personal answer would be 'yes' - as >long as >both Schemas validate the same documents in the same way, I think it is >perfectly reasonable to provide full fat and low fat versions. Although >people >could process the full fat version themselves to remove the annotations, my >experience is that the majority would feel happier using an "approved" low fat >Schema. > > Cheers, > Tony. >==== >Anthony B. Coates >London Market Systems Limited >33 Throgmorton Street, London, EC2N 2BR >http://www.londonmarketsystems.com/ >mailto:abcoates@londonmarketsystems.com >Mobile/Cell: +44 (79) 0543 9026 >[MDDL Editor (Market Data Definition Language), http://www.mddl.org/] >[FpML Arch WG Member (Financial Products Markup Language), >http://www.fpml.org/] >----------------------------------------------------------------------- >This Email may contain confidential information and/or copyright material >and is intended for the use of the addressee only. >Any unauthorised use may be unlawful. If you receive this Email by mistake >please advise the sender immediately by using the reply facility in your >e-mail software. >Email is not a secure method of communication and London Market Systems >Limited cannot accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of >this message or any attachment(s). Please examine this email for virus >infection, for which London Market Systems Limited accepts no >responsibility. If verification of this email is sought then please >request a hard copy. Unless otherwise stated any views or opinions >presented are solely those of the author and do not represent those of >London Market Systems Limited. > >You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting >http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl-ndrsc/members/leave_workgroup.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]