Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Rule: 72 representation term

[Dan Vint <dvint@acord.org>]

Wouldn't it be better to have a single rule and table that lays out the 
relation between the representation term and its data type (maybe even the 
BCC involved)? If we did that there would be one place to look this 
information up and we could remove the need for new rule with the additions 
of new types and remove rules like this and #68 which seems to be a 
generalization of this without the specific mapping.

If you need something specific to report against, if could be Rule #72-Date 
or Rule #72-Decimal.

..dan

At 08:01 AM 7/11/2003 -0500, Lisa-Aeon wrote:
>Rules for Voting:  Each email will have only one rule in it, I will try to
>mark the rules that group with it, or rules that might duplicate it.  The
>membership has 5 working days to bring forth objection or discussion, after
>the 5 working days, if there are no objections, the rule will be assumed to
>be "ACCEPTED" and be given to the LCSC for their implementation.
>
>Please Reply leaving first email in Reply.
>
>Voting period on this rule ends:  July 18, 2003
>
>*******************************
>[R 72]  For each representation term the equivalent data type must be used
>i.e. if the representation term Date is used, then the corresponding built
>in datatype xsd:date must be used.
>
>ATG Decision: rule has not yet been discussed by ATG2
>
>
>
>---
>
>File has not been scanned
>
>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 6.0.498 / Virus Database: 297 - Release Date: 7/8/2003