Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Rule: 83

[Dan Vint <dvint@acord.org>]

This seems to weak. I would change it to read:

>[R 83]   UBL documents MUST always identify their character encoding with 
>the XML declaration. It is also recommend that for protability that UTF-8 
>or UTF-16 be used; although trading partners may agree on other character 
>encodings to use among themselves.


At 10:17 AM 7/14/2003 -0500, Lisa-Aeon wrote:
>Rules for Voting:  Each email will have only one rule in it, I will try to
>mark the rules that group with it, or rules that might duplicate it.  The
>membership has 5 working days to bring forth objection or discussion, after
>the 5 working days, if there are no objections, the rule will be assumed to
>be "ACCEPTED" and be given to the LCSC for their implementation.
>
>Please Reply leaving first email in Reply.
>
>Voting period on this rule ends:  July 18, 2003
>
>*******************************
>[R 83]   Trading partners may agree on other character encodings to use
>among themselves. It is recommended in all case that encoding declarations
>be provided in the XML declarations of UBL documents.
>
>
>ATG Decision:  rule has not yet been discussed by ATG2
>
>
>
>---
>
>File has not been scanned
>
>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 6.0.498 / Virus Database: 297 - Release Date: 7/8/2003