[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ubl-ndrsc] Rule: 96 Two Schema
I think we should remove this rule. A user can filter out annotations if they are unwanted. -----Original Message----- From: Chin Chee-Kai [mailto:cheekai@softml.net] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 9:52 AM To: UBL-NDR Subject: Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Rule: 96 Two Schema Objection : Stating two versions of schemas that are otherwise the same except for documentation is a user-level optimisation/preference issue that shouldn't become a hard-rule from UBL/NDR. This is not to say that we cannot publish as a non-normative add-on, or reading aid or optimized version (assuming documented version is normative). Suggest removing it. Best Regards, Chin Chee-Kai SoftML Tel: +65-6820-2979 Fax: +65-6743-7875 Email: cheekai@SoftML.Net http://SoftML.Net/ On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Lisa-Aeon wrote: >>Rules for Voting: Each email will have only one rule in it, I will >>try to mark the rules that group with it, or rules that might >>duplicate it. The membership has 5 working days to bring forth >>objection or discussion, after the 5 working days, if there are no >>objections, the rule will be assumed to be "ACCEPTED" and be given to >>the LCSC for their implementation. >> >>Please Reply leaving first email in Reply. >> >>Voting period on this rule ends: July 22, 2003 >> >>******************************* >>[R 96] Two schemas shall be developed for each standard. One schema >>shall be a run-time schema devoid of documentation. One schema shall >>be a fully annotated schema that employs XHTML for the annotations. >> >> >>ATG Decision: ACCEPTED. >> >> >>--- >>Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. >>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). >>Version: 6.0.498 / Virus Database: 297 - Release Date: 7/8/2003 >>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]