Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Rule: 99 Simple Type Restriction

[Dan Vint <dvint@acord.org>]

This rule seems a little strange to me. The implication is that we have 
gone through all the schema capabilities and have indicated yes/no as to 
what can be used - is this true? If it is true, then I would recommend one 
rule that has a table of all the "features" with an indication of their 
use. It will be easier to find and maintain.

..dan

At 10:05 AM 7/15/2003 -0500, Lisa-Aeon wrote:
>Rules for Voting:  Each email will have only one rule in it, I will try to
>mark the rules that group with it, or rules that might duplicate it.  The
>membership has 5 working days to bring forth objection or discussion, after
>the 5 working days, if there are no objections, the rule will be assumed to
>be "ACCEPTED" and be given to the LCSC for their implementation.
>
>Please Reply leaving first email in Reply.
>
>Voting period on this rule ends:  July 22, 2003
>
>*******************************
>[R 99]  Simple Type restriction MAY be used.
>
>
>ATG Decision: ACCEPTED.
>
>
>---
>Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 6.0.498 / Virus Database: 297 - Release Date: 7/8/2003