Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Rule: 100 Union Codelists

[Dan Vint <dvint@acord.org>]

How about:

>[R 100] Union MAY be used to create new simple datatypes as long as those 
>types are not enumerated types (code lists).

..dan

At 10:05 AM 7/15/2003 -0500, Lisa-Aeon wrote:
>Rules for Voting:  Each email will have only one rule in it, I will try to
>mark the rules that group with it, or rules that might duplicate it.  The
>membership has 5 working days to bring forth objection or discussion, after
>the 5 working days, if there are no objections, the rule will be assumed to
>be "ACCEPTED" and be given to the LCSC for their implementation.
>
>Please Reply leaving first email in Reply.
>
>Voting period on this rule ends:  July 22, 2003
>
>*******************************
>[R 100] Union technique MAY be used to merge data types. UBL: Not
>applicable. Therefore, SHOULD NOT be used. (Code lists are excluded from
>this rule.)
>
>
>ATG Decision: Change to:  Union technique MAY be used to merge data types.
>
>
>---
>Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 6.0.498 / Virus Database: 297 - Release Date: 7/8/2003
>