RE: [ubl-ndrsc] Rule: 85

[Dan Vint <dvint@acord.org>]

True, but at least this is placing the requirement in the right place. I 
don't know of anything I can do in the instance to fix a problem caused in 
the schema.

Also this is a should be, so I thin that handles the subjectiveness of the 
rule.

I could also see deleting it if folks found it really objectionable. I 
don't think that it is a bad design principal. It sort of goes along with 
the idea of terseness not being a goal in XML - maybe this is just a 
friendlier way of saying that.

..dan

At 03:58 PM 7/15/2003 -0400, Grimley Michael J NPRI wrote:
> > [R 85]   Schemas should be designed (or generated) such that instances
> > conforming to them are readable and understandable, and should enable
> > reasonably intuitive interactions.
>
>Better, but I'm still wondering if the judgment of such things is too 
>subjective for a rule ...
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Dan Vint [mailto:dvint@acord.org]
>Sent: Monday, 14 July 2003 16:18
>To: UBL-NDR
>Subject: Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Rule: 85
>
>
>I don't think the Instance has anything to do with the readability and
>understandability. Seems to me this should be a requirement for the schema
>design/generation process. This seems more appropriate:
>
>[R 85]   Schemas should be designed (or generated) such that instances
>conforming to them are readable and understandable, and should enable
>reasonably intuitive interactions.
>
>
>At 10:17 AM 7/14/2003 -0500, Lisa-Aeon wrote:
> >Rules for Voting:  Each email will have only one rule in it, I will try to
> >mark the rules that group with it, or rules that might duplicate it.  The
> >membership has 5 working days to bring forth objection or discussion, after
> >the 5 working days, if there are no objections, the rule will be assumed to
> >be "ACCEPTED" and be given to the LCSC for their implementation.
> >
> >Please Reply leaving first email in Reply.
> >
> >Voting period on this rule ends:  July 18, 2003
> >
> >*******************************
> >[R 85]   Instances conforming to schemas should be readable and
> >understandable, and should enable reasonably intuitive interactions.
> >
> >
> >ATG Decision:  rule has not yet been discussed by ATG2
> >
> >
> >
> >---
> >
> >File has not been scanned
> >
> >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> >Version: 6.0.498 / Virus Database: 297 - Release Date: 7/8/2003
>
>
>You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting 
>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl-ndrsc/members/leave_workgroup.php
>
>You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting 
>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl-ndrsc/members/leave_workgroup.php