Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Rule: 107 XSD prefix

[Dan Vint <dvint@acord.org>]

I'm a little surprised that we have a rule restricting the namespace 
prefix. I agree UBL should probably use one prefix for consistency, but it 
doesn't really matter what the actual value is other than making 
documentation a little easier for all UBL messages. What does it matter if 
my actual implementation uses something different?

..dan

At 10:21 AM 7/16/2003 -0500, Lisa-Aeon wrote:
>Rules for Voting:  Each email will have only one rule in it, I will try to
>mark the rules that group with it, or rules that might duplicate it.  The
>membership has 5 working days to bring forth objection or discussion, after
>the 5 working days, if there are no objections, the rule will be assumed to
>be "ACCEPTED" and be given to the LCSC for their implementation.
>
>Please Reply leaving first email in Reply.
>
>Voting period on this rule ends:  July 23, 2003
>
>*******************************
>[R 107]  The XSD prefix MUST be used.
>(xmlns:xsd=http://www.w3.org/2001/xmlSchema)
>
>Note: Move to part of R1.
>
>
>---
>Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 6.0.498 / Virus Database: 297 - Release Date: 7/8/2003
>