Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Rule: 112 Block Attribute

[Dan Vint <dvint@acord.org>]

Same comment on rule 111. Should ought to be MAY

Also should we be saying something about the schema level default settings 
for both of these as well as the local usage?

..dan

At 10:21 AM 7/16/2003 -0500, Lisa-Aeon wrote:
>Rules for Voting:  Each email will have only one rule in it, I will try to
>mark the rules that group with it, or rules that might duplicate it.  The
>membership has 5 working days to bring forth objection or discussion, after
>the 5 working days, if there are no objections, the rule will be assumed to
>be "ACCEPTED" and be given to the LCSC for their implementation.
>
>Please Reply leaving first email in Reply.
>
>Voting period on this rule ends:  July 23, 2003
>
>*******************************
>[R 112]  (not finalized) The block attribute SHALL be used to control
>extensions.
>
>
>---
>Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 6.0.498 / Virus Database: 297 - Release Date: 7/8/2003
>