Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Rule: 114 Notations

["CRAWFORD, Mark" <MCRAWFORD@lmi.org>]

Remember, we already *greed our normative form is XSD, and all of our rules would be focused accordingly.
Mark Crawford
Research Fellow - LMI XML Lead
W3C Advisory Committee, OASIS, RosettaNet Representative
Vice Chair - OASIS UBL TC & Chair Naming and Design Rules Subcommittee
Chair - UN/CEFACT XML Syntax Working Group
Editor - UN/CEFACT Core Components
______
Logistics Management Institute
2000 Corporate Ridge, McLean, VA 22102-7805
(703) 917-7177   Fax (703) 917-7481 
Wireless (703) 655-4810
mcrawford@lmi.org
http://www.lmi.org
"Opportunity is what you make of it"


-----Original Message-----
From: Eve L. Maler <eve.maler@sun.com>
To: Dan Vint <dvint@acord.org>
CC: Lisa-Aeon <lseaburg@aeon-llc.com>; UBL-NDR <ubl-ndrsc@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Wed Jul 16 15:14:20 2003
Subject: Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Rule: 114 Notations

Dan Vint wrote:

> Is there also a need for a  statement about the use of DTD declarations 
> in our schemas for things like entities?

Sigh, it would be most complete to do so -- as XML documents, schema 
modules could theoretically contain internal/external subsets.

> I'm assuming this rule is here because it really requires the use of the 
> DTD to declare the NOTATION in the first place.

The schema "notation" feature is supposedly not even compatible with the 
DTD <!NOTATION...> feature, so it's best to stay away from it for lots 
of reasons.

	Eve
-- 
Eve Maler                                        +1 781 442 3190
Sun Microsystems                            cell +1 781 354 9441
Web Technologies and Standards               eve.maler @ sun.com


You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl-ndrsc/members/leave_workgroup.php