[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-ndrsc] eGov Code List Paper
** Reply to message from "Lisa-Aeon" <email@example.com> on Wed, 23 Jul 2003 10:43:47 -0500 > Paul Spence of the Office of the eEnvoy of the UK Government has submitted > this paper to us for consideration. Please review, we will be discussing > code lists on Monday in Montreal. One issue I had with this proposal is that it uses <xs:annotation> inside <xs:enumeration>. The Schema spec allows this, and XML Spy lets you do it, but TurboXML deletes any annotations inside enumerations as you load a Schema. This kind of patchy support is why I wouldn't normally use annotations inside enumerations myself, even though I often want to annotate my enumerations. Between this and the FPSC proposal, there seem to be numerous groups who want to annotate the UBL Schemas. I can't see all of the annotations making it into the official Schemas. It's a pity that the W3C has never moved on the SAF (Schema Adjunct Framework) proposal, since this allowed the annotations to be stored external to the Schema, and allowed multiple sets of annotations to be attached to the same Schema. It makes me wonder whether SAF should be lured to OASIS instead, if its proponents are still interested. Cheers, Tony. ==== Anthony B. Coates London Market Systems Limited 33 Throgmorton Street, London, EC2N 2BR http://www.londonmarketsystems.com/ mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org Mobile/Cell: +44 (79) 0543 9026 [MDDL Editor (Market Data Definition Language), http://www.mddl.org/] [FpML Arch WG Member (Financial Products Markup Language), http://www.fpml.org/] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- This Email may contain confidential information and/or copyright material and is intended for the use of the addressee only. Any unauthorised use may be unlawful. If you receive this Email by mistake please advise the sender immediately by using the reply facility in your e-mail software. Email is not a secure method of communication and London Market Systems Limited cannot accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this message or any attachment(s). Please examine this email for virus infection, for which London Market Systems Limited accepts no responsibility. If verification of this email is sought then please request a hard copy. Unless otherwise stated any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not represent those of London Market Systems Limited.