RE: [ubl-ndrsc] RosettaNet Comments

[Grimley Michael J NPRI <GrimleyMJ@Npt.NUWC.Navy.Mil>]

I believe we already have changed this one.

It seems they were working from a rather old (relatively speaking) rule list.


-----Original Message-----
From: Lisa-Aeon [mailto:lseaburg@aeon-llc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 24 September 2003 18 11
To: UBL-NDR
Subject: [ubl-ndrsc] RosettaNet Comments


We received a comments document from RosettaNet that went through a
comparison and commenting of our NDRs.  We have broken them into sections
that go together for discussion purposes.  Each section is being sent out in
email. Please take the time to read through and comment back to the list.
Since we are so close to deadline, this is important that it get done as
soon as possible.  Thank you.


2.3.4 Rule 84

Rule: messages must express semantics fully in schemas and not rely merely
on well-formedness




Comment: It is not clear what the rule enforces. Is the intention to say
that all instance documents need to be valid?




Suggestions:

Change the wording to make the rule clear.




++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Lisa Seaburg
AEON Consulting
Website: http://www.aeon-llc.com
Email:  lseaburg@aeon-llc.com
Alternative Email: xcblgeek@yahoo.com
Phone: 662-562-7676
Cellphone: 662-501-7676

"If you obey all the rules, you miss all the fun."
                       -Katharine Hepburn
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.515 / Virus Database: 313 - Release Date: 9/1/2003