[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ubl-ndrsc] NDR Checklist Clarification
Sorry for the very late response. In my travels and recovery period I missed this entirely. Tim wrote - > my interpretation of [D6] is: > > data type = qualifier + (primary or secondary representation term ) > NOT > data type = (primary qualifier + primary) or (secondary qualifier > +secondary representation term ) > > either way, as far as UBL is concerned in all known cases, > qualifier is > null, therefore data type is either a primary or secondary > representation term. my question to mark is can we therefore > drop the > qualifer altogether and make this rule fixed. > > it is up to the CCTS people to say if this is complaint or not. I would concur. Mark
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]