[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ubl-ndrsc] RosettaNet Comments Update
Sorry - forgot to mention... Please consider the RN XDG submitted to UBL for consideration, and post this at the appropriate UBL website. I will also update you in case of any significant revisions. Regards, -Suresh Sterling Commerce (on loan to RosettaNet) 469 524 2676 (O), 469 323 0234 (Cell) -----Original Message----- From: Damodaran, Suresh Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 7:27 PM To: 'Lisa-Aeon'; Ubl-Lcsc; UBL-NDR Cc: 'jon.bosak@sun.com'; Bill.Meadows@sun.com; paul.tearnen@rosettanet.org Subject: RE: [ubl-ndrsc] RosettaNet Comments Update Hi Lisa, To follow up with the earlier document that described the differences between RosettaNet and UBL XML guidelines, please see attached RosettaNet XML Design Guidelines. We hope to see convergence between corresponding UBL guidelines, and this RosettaNet guideline. Regards, -Suresh -------------------------www.rosettanet.org ------------------------------- Suresh Damodaran, Ph.D. 469-524-2676(O) Chief Technologist, 469-323-0234(Cell) RosettaNet Lingua franca for eBusiness (on loan from Sterling Commerce, a SBC Company) ----------------------www.sterlingcommerce.com---------------------- -----Original Message----- From: Lisa-Aeon [mailto:lseaburg@aeon-llc.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:10 PM To: Ubl-Lcsc; UBL-NDR Subject: [ubl-ndrsc] RosettaNet Comments Update Just to go back and look at what was done over the RosettaNet Comments document: The RosettaNet folks gave us their comments in late September, just as we were gearing up for the 1.0 beta release, and when the NDR document was not yet to the point of being able to put the text around the rules. So, much work has going on. We read through their comments and we should have answered back to them, even if it was only to say - sorry but you are so late, where were these comments months ago when we needed them. At that time, I spent time sending out emails to the NDR SC looking for comments and putting the comments on the agenda of meetings. Timing for this kind of work was definitely off, and the priorities had to be the NDR document and getting the rules together. Then we went into the Oct Face to Face, and everyone knows the amount of work there was to be done there. Here are some of the email threads sent out to the NDRSC: http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl-ndrsc/200309/msg00049.html Tony Coates had some comments to the RosettaNet document: http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl-ndrsc/200309/msg00048.html Mike Grimley brought up the fact it seemed they were working with an older copy of the rules list. http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl-ndrsc/200309/msg00054.html I will discuss this further with my co-chairs about what we should do at this point in time. Stay tuned. Lisa ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Lisa Seaburg AEON Consulting Website: http://www.aeon-llc.com Email: lseaburg@aeon-llc.com Alternative Email: xcblgeek@yahoo.com Phone: 662-562-7676 Cellphone: 662-501-7676 "If you obey all the rules, you miss all the fun." -Katharine Hepburn ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.543 / Virus Database: 337 - Release Date: 11/21/2003
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]