RE: [ubl-ndrsc] FW: More ASBIE Confusion (in UBL)

[Grimley Michael J NPRI <GrimleyMJ@Npt.NUWC.Navy.Mil>]

Greetings,

I noticed that ELN3 was missing from the body of the latest NDR (Draft l), although it is listed in the Rules Table at the back. Here are the two relevant ASBIE rules:

---------------------------------
  [ELN3] A UBL global element name based on an ccts:ASBIE MUST be
  declared and bound to the xsd:complexType of its associated
  ccts:ABIE.

  [ELN4] A UBL global element name based on an ccts:ASBIE MUST be the
  ccts:ASBIE dictionary entry name property term and qualifiers; and the
  object class term and qualifiers of its associated ccts:ABIE.
  ccts:DictionaryEntryName separators MUST be removed.
  Redundant words in the ccts:ASBIE property term or qualifiers and the
  associated ccts:ABIE object class term or qualifiers MUST be dropped.
----------------------------------

Also, as another observation, the duplication of global element names is a result of not including the Object Class of the ASBIE in the element name.

Mike Grimley


-----Original Message-----
From: Grimley Michael J NPRI [mailto:GrimleyMJ@Npt.NUWC.Navy.Mil]
Sent: Wednesday, 14 January 2004 12 54
To: UBL Design Rules (E-mail)
Subject: RE: [ubl-ndrsc] FW: More ASBIE Confusion (in UBL)


Greetings,

After looking at some of the other schemas, it seems that the only time a global element isn't declared for the ASBIE is when its name would be the same as the global element declared for the ABIE in the Reusable schema.

Mike Grimley