[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Agenda - telecon 4 Feb 2004
Dear all our regular Weekly NDR calls will start at 12:00 EST - http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html? day=7&month=1&year=2004&hour=11&min=30&sec=0&p1=263. ------------------------ ############################################# STANDING INFORMATION FOR UBL CONFERENCE CALLS U.S. domestic toll-free number: (866)839-8145 Int. access/caller paid number: (865)524-6352 Access code: 5705229 ############################################# 1. Roll Call and Welcome from the chair (Mavis? - or Lisa) 2. Sub-Committee Reports LCSC TTSC CLSC Any others? Who ever is available we will hear reports. 3. Review any outstanding issues raised on the list, the following are from emails from LCSC members. A. Stephen Green requests: Would it be feasible to use xsd:gYearMonth as the base for a new DataType (in the CCTS sense) to cater for MM/YY (albeit YYYY-MM in ISO short date format) as used with Credit Card expiry dates? <xsd:simpleType name="expiryDate"> <xsd:restriction base="xsd:string"> <xsd:pattern value="([0-3][0-9]/\)?[0-1][0-2]/\[0-9]{2}"/> </xsd:restriction base="xsd:string"> </xsd:simpleType name="expiryDate"> where ([0-3][0-9]/\)?[0-1][0-2]/\[0-9]{2} is either DD/MM/YY (the DD/ is optional depending on the card) or MM/YY Is this exactly how it would appear in the UBL DataType Schema? B. Where is the cct:CodeType reference for the bits for the <!-- ===== RT: CodeType ===== --> <xsd:element name="CodeContent" type="rt:CodeContentType"/> <xsd:simpleType name="CodeContentType"> <xsd:restriction base="xsd:token"/> </xsd:simpleType> <xsd:element name="CodeType" type="rt:CodeType"/> <xsd:complexType name="CodeType"> <xsd:annotation> <xsd:documentation> <ccts:Component> <ccts:CategoryCode>RT</ccts:CategoryCode> <ccts:DictionaryEntryName>Code. Type</ccts:DictionaryEntryName> <ccts:Definition>A character string (letters, figures, or symbols) that for brevity and/or languange independence may be used to represent or replace a definitive value or text of an attribute together with relevant supplementary information.</ccts:Definition> <ccts:ObjectClass>Code</ccts:ObjectClass> <ccts:PropertyTerm>Type</ccts:PropertyTerm> </ccts:Component> </xsd:documentation> </xsd:annotation> <xsd:simpleContent> <xsd:extension base="rt:CodeContentType"/> </xsd:simpleContent> </xsd:complexType> I'm going through the CCT Datatype (Representation Term) Schema and I have a few issues still outstanding really from the last instance sample generation / review cycle 1. In Measure and in Quantity we still have unitCodeListID unitCodeListAgencyID unitCodeListAgencyName as supplementary components but in Code we have this restricted to *none* and in Amount we have it defined in the CCT Schema as currencyID codeListVersionID My question/issue is: with Code: the codelist mechanism might have to be very good to avoid need for any meta data at all - can we guarantee this? Shouldn't we still have listID listAgencyID listAgencyName ? with Amount a CCT issue really: we seem to have a version ID but is it decided and clear to all that there is just the one codelist that can be used so that we don't even have to specify what it is but only which version? 2. Just a request for feedback from the last NDRSC call (unavoidable that I couldn't make it) regarding my issue of type="xsd:token" missing from some of the elements in the Schema 3. Who will be editing the DT (CCT DT) and RT (UBL DT) Schemas? Will it still be Gunther and Garrett? Will it still be in collaboration / synchronisation with OAG and/or ATG? How will it fit with the schedule? and tools work? We'll presumably need any changes introduced prior to instance generation. There may be some impact on this and on FPSC work if the listID and listAgencyID are put back into the CCT DT Schema. I don't see what can be done, if anything at this stage, about the Amount supplementary components and how to specify the codeListID codeListAgencyID and codeListAgencyName but if it were possible and agreed we'd need a suitable schedule for this - Otherwise perhaps something should be put into the Documentation C. Question from Anne Hendry: In a recent Libarary Content meeting there was a question as to whether negative values could be valid values for some entities, as in the case of an adjustment amount. Since all the base types used by cct noted above are xs primitive types that allow negative values, and I can't see anywhere in either of the above files where there are any restrictions in terms of positive/negative value ranges (eg. no use of derived types such as PositiveInteger, nonNegativeInteger, unsgined*, etc), is it safe to assume the range of valid values for UBL entities based on these CC types includes the full range of values as allowed by the w3c schema primitive types on which they're based? Stephen also wants to add: Would there be any need to specify *how* (leading sign, trailing sign, etc) a negative amount is specified as a separate BIE to ensure correct interpretation of the negative aspect? Is the expression of negativity controlled enough so as to be clear and unambiguous? 4. Review and Editorial work on latest version of the NDR document Anne has an AI to find out the version number of the ndr document that Tim says was agreed to at the SF plenary. Would this be the Checklist, or does NDR generate something else at the F2F? If not, did the Checklist have a version number? 5. AOB To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl-ndrsc/members/leave_workgroup.php. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Lisa Seaburg AEON LLC, co-chair to OASIS UBL NDRSC Website: http://www.aeon-llc.com Email: lseaburg@aeon-llc.com Alternative Email: xcblgeek@yahoo.com Phone: 662-562-7676 Cellphone: 662-501-7676 "If you obey all the rules, you miss all the fun." -Katharine Hepburn ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.576 / Virus Database: 365 - Release Date: 1/30/2004
BEGIN:VCARD VERSION:2.1 N:Seaburg;Lisa FN:Lisa Seaburg (E-mail) ORG:Aeon LLC TEL;WORK;VOICE:(662) 562-7676 ADR;WORK:;;;Senatobia;MS;38668;USA LABEL;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:Senatobia, MS 38668=0D=0AUSA URL;WORK:http://www.aeon-llc.com EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:lseaburg@aeon-llc.com REV:20040203T221111Z END:VCARD
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]