RE: [ubl-ndrsc] Proposed NDR change

[Grimley Michael J NPRI <GrimleyMJ@Npt.NUWC.Navy.Mil>]

Actually, it's just going back to the change we made a couple of weeks ago (which we then changed back).

In the CCT Schema, we define an attribute for 'format'. In the UDT, we do a restriction to remove the 'format' attribute.


-----Original Message-----
From: MCRAWFORD@lmi.org [mailto:MCRAWFORD@lmi.org]
Sent: Friday, 02 April 2004 09 30
To: GrimleyMJ@Npt.NUWC.Navy.Mil
Cc: ubl-ndrsc@lists.oasis-open.org; jon.bosak@sun.com
Subject: RE: [ubl-ndrsc] Proposed NDR change


> 
> > The rule currently states:  For every ccts:CCT whose 
> supplementary components are equivalent directly onto the
> > properties of a built-in xsd:datatype, the 
> CCT:SupplementaryComponents MUST NOT be expressed as attributes, and
> > the ccts:CCT MUST be defined as a named xsd:simpleType in 
> the ccts:CCT schema module.
> 
> > What exactly would be changed?
> 
> I guess the new rule would look something like:
> 
> For every ccts:CCT whose supplementary components are 
> equivalent directly onto the properties of a built-in 
> xsd:datatype, the CCT:SupplementaryComponents attribute 
> representation MUST be restricted in the UDT (SDT?) schema.
> 
Can you give me an example, because this makes no sense to me

To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl-ndrsc/members/leave_workgroup.php.