RE: SV: [ubl-psc] SV: [ubl] Spreadsheets for ExtendedProcurement Models

["Sylvia Webb" <swebb@gefeg.com>]

Stephen,

It is easiest from a programming perspective and a processing perspective,
if there is only one end in each spreadsheet.

What are there issues with only splitting ABIE's between "common,
procurement/transport", etc? As I recall, the only task we were originally
trying to address in splitting these spreadsheets was manageability for
those who use them instead of data modeling tools.

Regards,
Sylvia
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Green [mailto:stephen_green@bristol-city.gov.uk] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 3:05 AM
To: plb@itst.dk; ubl-psc@lists.oasis-open.org
Cc: Jostein.Fromyr@EDISYS.NO; ml@tritorr.com
Subject: Re: SV: [ubl-psc] SV: [ubl] Spreadsheets for ExtendedProcurement
Models

Sylvia, Peter

I'd better put my hand up here and own up to the two 'END' rows in certain
documents. The reason is that we have a bit of an outstanding issue with the
fact that the ABIEs are not split just between 'common' and
'procurement/transport/etc' but also# there are ABIEs in document
spreadsheets apart from the actual document 'ABIE'. The document ABIE
(before the first 'END') gets into the document schema, but as I understand
it any other ABIE, though defined in the doc spreadsheet (as for the agreed
modeling architecture), stays in the 'common aggregate' 
schema (as for the NDR rule).

All the best

Steve

>>> Peter Larsen Borresen <plb@itst.dk> 13/09/05 10:02:49 >>>
Hi Sylvia

I am sorry that this has passed my review. It should either be in all
spreadsheets or in none. If it is no help for you, I suggest that we delete
them.

/Peter

-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: Sylvia Webb [mailto:swebb@gefeg.com]
Sendt: 13. september 2005 10:55
Til: Peter Larsen Borresen; ubl-psc@lists.oasis-open.org;
ubl@lists.oasis-open.org
Cc: 'Mark Leitch'; 'Jostein Frømyr'
Emne: RE: [ubl-psc] SV: [ubl] Spreadsheets for Extended Procurement Models


Hi Peter,

Thanks for the fast response.

If "END" is a processing instructions saying no more lines are expected,
please explain what in means in rows 29 and 38 of the Quote spreadsheet. It
is also in rows 21 and 65 in the Request for Quotation. 

Should this instruction be in all of the spreadsheets? There are a few like
Credit Note where it does not exist.

Regards,
Sylvia 

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Larsen Borresen [mailto:plb@itst.dk]
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 1:20 AM
To: 'swebb@gefeg.com'; ubl-psc@lists.oasis-open.org;
ubl@lists.oasis-open.org
Cc: Mark Leitch; Jostein Frømyr
Subject: [ubl-psc] SV: [ubl] Spreadsheets for Extended Procurement Models

Hi Syvia

"END" is a processing instruction telling that no more lines are expected. I
am not the inventer of this but this is how I understand it and Tim M agree
with me.

Kind reagards

Peter

-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: Sylvia Webb [mailto:swebb@gefeg.com]
Sendt: 13. september 2005 00:16
Til: ubl-psc@lists.oasis-open.org; ubl@lists.oasis-open.org
Cc: Mark Leitch ; Jostein Frømyr
Emne: [ubl] Spreadsheets for Extended Procurement Models


Peter,
 
Each of the spreadsheets has a row with the word "End".  Please explain what
this means and how it is to be used.
 
Thanks,
Sylvia



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php