[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-psc] Groups - UBL/Tax XML Planning Meeting added
Tim, Since we weren't able to discuss your latest model during the call last week, I'll include some questions and comments here. First of all, I agree that much of the confusion was a result of the Tax Category being associated with an Item. Adding Tax Classification as a way to classify items independent of their participation in a transaction is what TaxXML had in mind for Item Tax Category (I have no problem with the alternate name). Also, you may want to consider including an attribute for a classification code such as the harmonized code or other coding scheme. However, I'm still not sure that I understand how you've described Tax Category. The examples for Tax Category listed below; "Zero-Rated Goods", "NonTaxable" and "Standard Rate" are important descriptions that should be included to qualify the tax information, but I don't see how the attributes in Tax Category are appropriate. Your description of Tax Category says " this may be only indicative, the actual rate [or] other caluculation attributed to an item is dependent on the tax jurisdiction". I would think that the invoice should include the details of the actual tax imposed rather than what's indicative. This tax could be categorized by Tax Category as appropriate, but the category would be just that and not include the tax rates which are dependant on the context. Here's a rough alteration of your diagram to show what I have in mind: (Embedded image moved to file: pic00292.jpg) By the way, I may still not fully understand Tax Scheme, but for my interpretation I would expect that the Jurisdiction is a necessary attribute as well as the name of the tax that's imposed. Any further clarification on this would be appreciated. I look forward to any further discussion on these topics. Regards, John Glaubitz -----Tim McGrath <tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au> wrote: ----- To: swebb@gefeg.com From: Tim McGrath <tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au> Date: 11/08/2005 03:29AM cc: ubl-psc@lists.oasis-open.org, John.Glaubitz@vertexinc.com, Andy@gid.co.uk Subject: Re: [ubl-psc] Groups - UBL/Tax XML Planning Meeting added In preparation for this meeting I thought it might be useful to revisitthe question of UBL's Tax Category and the Tax Item Category requestedby TaxXML. My suggestion is that we leave the current UBL Tax Category to be thecategorization of the tax to be applied. This is defined as " thecategory of the tax and, by implication, the tax rate or other taxcalculation that applies. This may be only indicative, the actual rateof other calculation attributed to an item is dependent on the taxjurisdiction." For example, "ZeroRatedGoods" "NotTaxable""Standard Rate" are tax categories. However, this is not currently used correctly. In UBL 1.0 we have TaxCategory associated with Item. In fact, it should be associated withInvoice Line. That is, the Tax Category (as we define it) is dependenton the transaction NOT the Item. The same Item (e.g. a computer) canattract different Tax Categories depending on who buys it and what thecircumstances of the sale are. So it should be Invoice Line -> TaxCategory. I suspect this is what led to the confusion. our "Tax Category" wasneither one thing or the other. So, I also propose we introduce a "Tax Classification" ABIE (that isthe equivalent of the Tax XML Item Tax Category). (I suggest changingthe TaxXML term "category" to "classification" toline up with other classification schemes proposed for UBL 2.0.) This would be defined as "Aclassification of items that may be used to identify itemsfrom the perspective of determining tax liability." For example,itemsclassified as clothing may be subject to a standard tax rate in aparticularjurisdiction, however a sub classification of clothing, such aschildren's clothingmay be nontaxable or zero-rated, while another sub classification suchas luxuryclothing, for example furs, could have a surcharge or higher tax rate. It is this Tax Classification that should be associated with an Item. The classification is always the same for this Item regardless of thetransactions it participates in. In this way Item -> TaxClassification should replace Item->Tax Category. As far as what Tax Classification should look like, its only identifiedproperty (from the TaxXML paper) is a Name but it also has anassociation with Tax Category to set default tax rates for a given TaxScheme. From the example given these classifcation are hierarchical(has sub-classifications) as well. I have drafted a rough diagram of what the current and proposed modelswould look like. (see attached). Perhaps we can discuss these on the call Wednesday. swebb@gefeg.com wrote: Due to the regularly scheduled UBL call at 16:00 UTC, and a calendar mixupon my part, this meeting will need to conclude promptly at 15:30 UTC/10:30EST/7:30 PST. -- Ms. Sylvia WebbUBL/Tax XML Planning Meeting has been added by Ms. Sylvia WebbDate: Wednesday, 09 November 2005Time: 03:00pm - 03:30pm GMTEvent Description:############################################# STANDING INFORMATION FOR UBL CONFERENCE CALLS U.S. domestic toll-free number: (866)839-8145 Int. access/caller paid number: (865)524-6352 Access code: 5705229 #############################################Agenda:Discuss how UBL PSC and Tax XML can collaborate for UBL 2.0 content.Minutes:View event details: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl-psc/event.php?event_id=8904 PLEASE NOTE: If the above link does not work for you, your emailapplication may be breaking the link into two pieces. You may be able tocopy and paste the entire link address into the address field of your webbrowser. BEGIN:VCALENDARMETHOD:PUBLISHVERSION:2.0PRODID:-//Kavi Corporation//NONSGML Kavi Groups//ENX-WR-CALNAME:My CalendarBEGIN:VEVENTCATEGORIES:MEETINGSTATUS:TENTATIVEDTSTAMP:20051107T000000ZDTSTART:20051109T150000ZDTEND:20051109T153000ZSEQUENCE:0SUMMARY:UBL/Tax XML Planning MeetingDESCRIPTION:#############################################\n STANDING INFORMATION FOR UBL CONFERENCE CALLS\n U.S. domestic toll-free number: (866)839-8145\n Int. access/caller paid number: (865)524-6352\n Access code: 5705229\n #############################################\n\nGroup: UBL Procurement SC\nCreator: Ms. Sylvia WebbURL: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl-psc/event.php?event_id=8904 UID: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl-psc/event.php?event_id=8904 END:VEVENTEND:VCALENDAR -- regardstim mcgrathphone: +618 93352228 postal: po box 1289 fremantle western australia 6160DOCUMENT ENGINEERING: Analyzing and Designing Documents for Business Informatics and Web Services http://www.docengineering.com/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]