[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Account Response and Application Response.
We still need to decide what to do about these two document types. They both appear to do the same function (allow an application level response to a transaction), but they have different structures. I would like to only use one. My simple assessment is the Application Response is based on the EDIFACT APERAK document but the Account Response is designed to reference specific lines on documents. Can we get some debate on this? NB whichever structure we agree on can i suggest we call it an 'Application' Response as I am not sure how it could be seen as response from an 'Account'. -- regards tim mcgrath phone: +618 93352228 postal: po box 1289 fremantle western australia 6160 DOCUMENT ENGINEERING: Analyzing and Designing Documents for Business Informatics and Web Services http://www.docengineering.com/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]