[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: Clarification of comments to UBL 2.0
thank you for this clarification. we will be working on all comments over the coming weeks and should be able to respond following our next UBL Plenary meeting in Brussels on May 22-26. PS. you are welcome to attend the plenary meeting (as an invited guest) if you would like to. Veronique Testa wrote: >Currently, "Delivery" can only be described with its Address. It could also >be necessary to set the Name for Delivery To if different. >The suggestion based on a real need is to add a Party to pass on all >information about the Delivery To. > >Sorry for any confusion. > >Veronique Testa >Cegedim > >-----Message d'origine----- >De : Tim McGrath [mailto:tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au] >Envoye : mardi 28 mars 2006 09:09 >A : veronique.testa@cegedim.fr >Cc : ubl-psc@lists.oasis-open.org >Objet : Clarification of comments to UBL 2.0 > > >In your comments of 13 march to UBL 2.0 you stated: > >"There's no way (same as UBL 1.0) to provide the name of the Delivery (No >Party identification). Useful" > >We are unclear exactly what you mean. Do you mean there is no Party for >"Deliver to", only the Address? > >-- >regards >tim mcgrath >phone: +618 93352228 >postal: po box 1289 fremantle western australia 6160 >web: http://www.portcomm.com.au/tmcgrath > > > > > > -- regards tim mcgrath phone: +618 93352228 postal: po box 1289 fremantle western australia 6160 web: http://www.portcomm.com.au/tmcgrath
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]