ubl-psc message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-psc] Two unrelated items
- From: Mark Leitch <ml@tritorr.com>
- To: <jon.bosak@sun.com>,<ubl-psc@lists.oasis-open.org>
- Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 17:49:27 +0100
Title: Re: [ubl-psc] Two unrelated items
Regarding the points in the hyperlink:
Firstly I’d change the emphasis from ‘universal’ business language... to... universal business language
- UBL 2.0 does allows for delivery and or invoice receipts to be sent to a corporation or a private individual; don’t see a problem here.
- I assume the requirement here is for a UBL receipt/invoice to be stored on the smart card. This can already be done. Whether I buy a PC as a private individual or as a business from a supplier, the invoice is exactly the same.
If I’m missing something, please let me know and the PSC will consider it further.
Re. the approved acronyms, I will discuss with Peter Borresen.
Mark Leitch
Director - Tritorr Ltd
tel.: +44 1932 821112
cell.: +44 7881 822999
mail: ml@tritorr.com
skype: wmarkle
site: www.tritorr.com
> From: <jon.bosak@sun.com>
> Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 06:25:38 -0700 (PDT)
> To: <ubl-psc@lists.oasis-open.org>
> Subject: [ubl-psc] Two unrelated items
>
> Hello PSC,
>
> The TC has asked me to forward the following two inquiries:
>
> - I appear to have overlooked a very early comment:
>
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl-comment/200501/msg00000.html
>
> Tim thinks it possible that the issue raised here has been
> dealt with in another way. Please confirm.
>
> - We need someone to generate a list of approved acronyms for
> review by the TC. Could a PSC member take responsibility for
> this?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Jon
>
>
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]