[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: SV: SV: [ubl-psc] Visiting Address
Martin, can you answer on that. I remember you pointed at it at you last day in London. /Peter -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Tim McGrath [mailto:tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au] Sendt: 25. august 2006 01:12 Til: Peter Borresen Cc: ubl-psc@lists.oasis-open.org Emne: Re: SV: [ubl-psc] Visiting Address i cannot see visiting address in the CEFACT library so where does it align? Peter Borresen wrote: >It was original an Norwegian requirement and is also an allignment with >UN/CEFACT > >/Peter > >-----Oprindelig meddelelse----- >Fra: Tim McGrath [mailto:tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au] >Sendt: 24. august 2006 05:33 >Til: ubl-psc@lists.oasis-open.org >Emne: [ubl-psc] Visiting Address > > >In updating the change log I came across the qualified Address for a >Party called "Visiting" defined as "The Party's visiting address". Is >this the same as their physical address, ie the place you actually go to >to see the party? If so, then can i propose we change it to Party. >Physical_ Location (where Location contains an Address). > >The reason I ask is because: >a. i am not sure Visiting_ Address is common english >and >b. the UN/CEFACT core component library uses Party. Physical_ Location. > >We have a few days to think about this, perhaps we can decide on the >call next monday? > > > -- regards tim mcgrath phone: +618 93352228 postal: po box 1289 fremantle western australia 6160 web: http://www.portcomm.com.au/tmcgrath
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]