OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ubl-psc message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: SV: SV: [ubl-psc] Visiting Address

Martin, can you answer on that. I remember you pointed at it at you last day
in London.


-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: Tim McGrath [mailto:tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au]
Sendt: 25. august 2006 01:12
Til: Peter Borresen
Cc: ubl-psc@lists.oasis-open.org
Emne: Re: SV: [ubl-psc] Visiting Address

i cannot see visiting address in the CEFACT library so where does it align?

Peter Borresen wrote:

>It was original an Norwegian requirement and is also an allignment with
>-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
>Fra: Tim McGrath [mailto:tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au]
>Sendt: 24. august 2006 05:33
>Til: ubl-psc@lists.oasis-open.org
>Emne: [ubl-psc] Visiting Address
>In updating the change log I came across the qualified Address for a 
>Party called "Visiting" defined as "The Party's visiting address".  Is 
>this the same as their physical address, ie the place you actually go to 
>to see the party?  If so, then can i propose we change it to Party. 
>Physical_ Location (where Location contains an Address).
>The reason I ask is because:
>a. i am not sure Visiting_ Address is common english
>b. the UN/CEFACT core component library uses Party. Physical_ Location.
>We have a few days to think about this, perhaps we can decide on the 
>call next monday?

tim mcgrath
phone: +618 93352228  
postal: po box 1289   fremantle    western australia 6160
web: http://www.portcomm.com.au/tmcgrath

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]