RE: SV: [ubl-psc] Visiting Address

["Martin Forsberg" <martin.forsberg@amnis.se>]

 Hi Peter,

I've looked into the CC-library and the cross industry invoice and I can
not find any reference to a visiting-address. Perhaps it has been
changed since our London-meeting. The only addresses used in the CII are
* Structured Postal Address
* Unstructured Postal Address
* Post Box Postal Address

Regards
Martin Forsberg


-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Borresen [mailto:PLB@itst.dk] 
Sent: den 25 augusti 2006 10:34
To: ubl-psc@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: SV: SV: [ubl-psc] Visiting Address

Martin, can you answer on that. I remember you pointed at it at you last
day in London.

/Peter

-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: Tim McGrath [mailto:tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au]
Sendt: 25. august 2006 01:12
Til: Peter Borresen
Cc: ubl-psc@lists.oasis-open.org
Emne: Re: SV: [ubl-psc] Visiting Address


i cannot see visiting address in the CEFACT library so where does it
align?

Peter Borresen wrote:

>It was original an Norwegian requirement and is also an allignment with

>UN/CEFACT
>
>/Peter
>
>-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
>Fra: Tim McGrath [mailto:tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au]
>Sendt: 24. august 2006 05:33
>Til: ubl-psc@lists.oasis-open.org
>Emne: [ubl-psc] Visiting Address
>
>
>In updating the change log I came across the qualified Address for a 
>Party called "Visiting" defined as "The Party's visiting address".  Is 
>this the same as their physical address, ie the place you actually go 
>to to see the party?  If so, then can i propose we change it to Party.
>Physical_ Location (where Location contains an Address).
>
>The reason I ask is because:
>a. i am not sure Visiting_ Address is common english and b. the 
>UN/CEFACT core component library uses Party. Physical_ Location.
>
>We have a few days to think about this, perhaps we can decide on the 
>call next monday?
>
>  
>

--
regards
tim mcgrath
phone: +618 93352228  
postal: po box 1289   fremantle    western australia 6160
web: http://www.portcomm.com.au/tmcgrath