OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ubl-psc message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: SV: SV: [ubl-psc] Visiting Address


Ok lets go ahead with this and I will add it to the Issues list.

If anyone has any problems lets talk about it on Monday's call or via email.


Peter Borresen wrote:
Hi Tim

Then I have nothing against you suggestion else that I would like very much
the close the issue-list. 

/Peter

-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: Martin Forsberg [mailto:martin.forsberg@amnis.se]
Sendt: 25. august 2006 11:06
Til: ubl-psc@lists.oasis-open.org
Emne: RE: SV: [ubl-psc] Visiting Address


 Hi Peter,

I've looked into the CC-library and the cross industry invoice and I can
not find any reference to a visiting-address. Perhaps it has been
changed since our London-meeting. The only addresses used in the CII are
* Structured Postal Address
* Unstructured Postal Address
* Post Box Postal Address

Regards
Martin Forsberg


-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Borresen [mailto:PLB@itst.dk] 
Sent: den 25 augusti 2006 10:34
To: ubl-psc@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: SV: SV: [ubl-psc] Visiting Address

Martin, can you answer on that. I remember you pointed at it at you last
day in London.

/Peter

-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: Tim McGrath [mailto:tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au]
Sendt: 25. august 2006 01:12
Til: Peter Borresen
Cc: ubl-psc@lists.oasis-open.org
Emne: Re: SV: [ubl-psc] Visiting Address


i cannot see visiting address in the CEFACT library so where does it
align?

Peter Borresen wrote:

  
It was original an Norwegian requirement and is also an allignment with
    

  
UN/CEFACT

/Peter

-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: Tim McGrath [mailto:tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au]
Sendt: 24. august 2006 05:33
Til: ubl-psc@lists.oasis-open.org
Emne: [ubl-psc] Visiting Address


In updating the change log I came across the qualified Address for a 
Party called "Visiting" defined as "The Party's visiting address".  Is 
this the same as their physical address, ie the place you actually go 
to to see the party?  If so, then can i propose we change it to Party.
Physical_ Location (where Location contains an Address).

The reason I ask is because:
a. i am not sure Visiting_ Address is common english and b. the 
UN/CEFACT core component library uses Party. Physical_ Location.

We have a few days to think about this, perhaps we can decide on the 
call next monday?

 

    

--
regards
tim mcgrath
phone: +618 93352228  
postal: po box 1289   fremantle    western australia 6160
web: http://www.portcomm.com.au/tmcgrath



  

-- 
regards
tim mcgrath
phone: +618 93352228  
postal: po box 1289   fremantle    western australia 6160
web: http://www.portcomm.com.au/tmcgrath


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]