[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: SV: SV: [ubl-psc] Visiting Address
Ok lets go ahead with this and I will add it to the Issues list. If anyone has any problems lets talk about it on Monday's call or via email. Peter Borresen wrote: Hi Tim Then I have nothing against you suggestion else that I would like very much the close the issue-list. /Peter -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Martin Forsberg [mailto:martin.forsberg@amnis.se] Sendt: 25. august 2006 11:06 Til: ubl-psc@lists.oasis-open.org Emne: RE: SV: [ubl-psc] Visiting Address Hi Peter, I've looked into the CC-library and the cross industry invoice and I can not find any reference to a visiting-address. Perhaps it has been changed since our London-meeting. The only addresses used in the CII are * Structured Postal Address * Unstructured Postal Address * Post Box Postal Address Regards Martin Forsberg -----Original Message----- From: Peter Borresen [mailto:PLB@itst.dk] Sent: den 25 augusti 2006 10:34 To: ubl-psc@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: SV: SV: [ubl-psc] Visiting Address Martin, can you answer on that. I remember you pointed at it at you last day in London. /Peter -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Tim McGrath [mailto:tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au] Sendt: 25. august 2006 01:12 Til: Peter Borresen Cc: ubl-psc@lists.oasis-open.org Emne: Re: SV: [ubl-psc] Visiting Address i cannot see visiting address in the CEFACT library so where does it align? Peter Borresen wrote:It was original an Norwegian requirement and is also an allignment withUN/CEFACT /Peter -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Tim McGrath [mailto:tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au] Sendt: 24. august 2006 05:33 Til: ubl-psc@lists.oasis-open.org Emne: [ubl-psc] Visiting Address In updating the change log I came across the qualified Address for a Party called "Visiting" defined as "The Party's visiting address". Is this the same as their physical address, ie the place you actually go to to see the party? If so, then can i propose we change it to Party. Physical_ Location (where Location contains an Address). The reason I ask is because: a. i am not sure Visiting_ Address is common english and b. the UN/CEFACT core component library uses Party. Physical_ Location. We have a few days to think about this, perhaps we can decide on the call next monday?-- regards tim mcgrath phone: +618 93352228 postal: po box 1289 fremantle western australia 6160 web: http://www.portcomm.com.au/tmcgrath -- regards tim mcgrath phone: +618 93352228 postal: po box 1289 fremantle western australia 6160 web: http://www.portcomm.com.au/tmcgrath |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]