OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ubl-psc message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: [FIRTG] Issue list for UBL 2.1

UBL FIRTG submission:

As agreed during the last UBL TC meeting, please find attached the 
latest FIRTG (Financial Info Requirements Task Group) issues.

The previous FIRTG issues could be partially or fully overridden by this 
version, with the exception of the last e-mail sent to PSC containing 
some Italian invoicing requirements.

Descriptions and clarifications could be quite long so it is necessary 
to double-click the cell in order to read all the content.

I tried to further simplify the issues to facilitate the PSC 
understanding, expecially about strict financial requirements.

The issues are mainly related to the UBL Invoice and the Remittance 
Advice, but not limited to these.

The financial informations are introducing important aspects like the 
"Factoring" (Invoice Financing) and the "Payment Mandate" (eMandate).

Either PSC and UBL TC are please asked to evaluate the issues and to 
find the best location for the requested information items and their 

The eMandate, for instance, could generate the requirement of a new 
separated business document, or just a new ABIE, or could be supported 
by adding single information into the actual structures of Payment 

In general, the two main payment processes called Credit Transfer (CT) 
and Direct Debit (DD) could be better supported by UBL.

Actually the Remittance Advice is supporting the Credit Transfer payment 
advice, but not supporting the Direct Debit.

As alternatives to create a separated UBL Mandate we could have:
- the use of the Purchase Order as valid payment Mandate.
- the extension of the actual Remittance Advice to act also as an 
electronic Mandate for Direct Debit payments.

Full details are available into the issue list.

The UNIFI name is no more used by ISO and should be red as ISO20022.

There could be Remarks added after Dispositions as the document has been 
reviewed by Georg Birgisson, Tim McGrath and me into different sessions.

WS/BII Submission
Additionally please find a separated set of requirements collected 
during the WS/BII work by Georg Birgisson.
I had no time to review this new set from BII, but I'll do it in the 
next days and forward some comments to PSC if necessary.

Due to time zone and business priorities I will be pleased to answer any 
question (or forward this to specific experts) by mail.
I usually reply the same day, so I hope you will appreciate my availability.


Roberto Cisternino

UBL-2 0-Issues-2009-25-08-FIRTG-C3.xls

CENBII WG1 UBL additions.xls

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]