Waiting for further discussion
The end-2-end identifier, as intended by
ISO20022, is the same concept of the cbc:InvoicingPartyReference we
currently have in the UBL RemittanceAdvice document.
The definition is strictly that one provided by UBL 2.0, "The Invoicing
Party's reference to the payment, previously requested of the Payer to
Into UBL this is a textual reference and not an identifier, but the
bigger problem is to clarify the relationship between this
reconciliation reference information and the Invoice line items.
I think there is not a precise rule for this, as it is up to the
Invoicing Party to indicate one or more references for reconciliation
Such reference could be associated to a single invoice line item, a set
of line items, a complete invoice, more than one invoice and even
different parts of different invoices.
The solution seems to be to provide this InvoicingPartyReference at
line Item and in the root of the document (RemittanceAdvice and
To be evaluated by Tim McGrath as this is
a cross-domain information transported end-2-end for reconciliation
purposes. Also it impacts on many UBL documents (Invoice,