OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ubl-psc message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: SV: [ubl-psc] Status of issues raised in November 2010


Hi,

 

Is it really possible to describe an area with just a set of coordinates, without knowing how they are connected? (see the attached picture). It should somehow at least be indicated that the coordinates form the boundary of the area.

 

 

/Martin

 

Från: Arianna Brutti [mailto:arianna.brutti@enea.it]
Skickat: den 14 februari 2011 17:39
Till: amschoka@comcast.net
Kopia: gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com; 'ubl-psc@lists.oasis-open.org'
Ämne: Re: [ubl-psc] Status of issues raised in November 2010

 

Ok, done.
Arianna

Il 14/02/2011 17:21, amschoka@comcast.net ha scritto:

All,
Prior to prd01 coming out there was a discussion in TSC about making the cardinality of Location Coordinate
0..n so that it could be used for defining an area using a set of points. Perhaps Ken or Tim remembers.
Andy


Connected by DROID on Verizon Wireless



-----Original message-----

From: Arianna Brutti <arianna.brutti@enea.it>
To:
"G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>
Cc:
"'ubl-psc@lists.oasis-open.org'" <ubl-psc@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent:
Mon, Feb 14, 2011 15:41:44 GMT+00:00
Subject:
Re: [ubl-psc] Status of issues raised in November 2010

Hi Ken,

--> about item (2), currently we have:

ASBIE from Location to LocationCoordinate cardinality 0..1

and LocationCoordinate is as follows:

CoordinateSystemCode                  0..1

LatitudeDegreesMeasure                 0..1

LatitudeMinutesMeasure                  0..1

LatitudeDirectionCode                     0..1

LongitudeDegreesMeasure              0..1

LongitudeMinutesMeasure               0..1

LongitudeDirectionCode                  0..1

AltitudeMeasure                              0..1


Please, let me know if the final decision was to update the cardinalities.


--> About point (3): could you provide me a list of "bad" descriptions?

--> About point (4) I agree with you. During the 2nd public review, we could make a list of tautological definitions and update them.

Best regards
Arianna

Il 09/02/2011 19:43, G. Ken Holman ha scritto:

Hello PSC members,

Can you please review items (2), (3) and (4) in this message I posted to the UBL TC list in November?

  http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/201011/msg00008.html

When I heard on the call that all of the issues for PRD1 had been addressed, I was unsure if these issues were included in that statement.

Thank you!

. . . . . . . . . . Ken

--
Contact us for world-wide XML consulting & instructor-led training
Crane Softwrights Ltd.          http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/m/
G. Ken Holman                 mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com
Legal business disclaimers:  http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

 

 

area.png



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]