I agree with Arianna, we should change Fulfilment Cancellation
document type to use the cardinalities suggested and also add the
text to the descriptions.
On 4/04/12 4:08 PM, Arianna Brutti
wrote:
Hi Jon,
please, find my comments below.
Il 01/04/2012 04:14, Jon Bosak ha scritto:
Hello
PSC,
1. I've attempted to make the proposed language for the addition
of the
Fulfilment Cancellation fit the diagrams provided by Peter,
but I'm
not sure that the result adequately captures the intent of
the
Subcommittee.
Attached is a snapshot of Section 2.7, Fulfilment. Please
review
this carefully for accuracy and completeness.
>From my side, it looks fine.
2. Regarding these proposed additions to the table of party
roles:
ACTOR: Customer Party
ROLE: Buyer
SENDS: Fulfilment Cancellation
RECEIVES: Fulfilment Cancellation
ACTOR: Supplier Party
ROLE: Seller
SENDS: Fulfilment Cancellation
RECEIVES: Fulfilment Cancellation
I have added Fulfilment Cancellation to the rows for
Customer Party
/
Buyer and Supplier Party / Seller, but I am not sure these
entries
make sense (see attachment with PDF of the table). For
example,
Fulfilment Cancellation would seem to belong with the
document
types
under Customer Party / Delivery rather than Customer Party /
Buyer,
and with Supplier Party / Despatch rather than Supplier
Party /
Seller.
I agree with your point.
The reason due to I suggested:
ACTOR: Customer Party
ROLE: Buyer
SENDS: Fulfilment Cancellation
RECEIVES: Fulfilment Cancellation
ACTOR: Supplier Party
ROLE: Seller
SENDS: Fulfilment Cancellation
RECEIVES: Fulfilment Cancellation
is that if I look at the document model, I find:
BuyerCustomerParty 1..1
SellerSupplierParty 1..1
DeliveryCustomerParty 0..1
DespatchSupplierParty 0..1
and, if I am not wrong, the underlying idea should be that, in
each UBL
document, the mandatory parties are the sender and the receiver
...
But, definitely, looking at the diagram I agree with your point.
I don't know ... shall we change the cardinality in the document
model?
BuyerCustomerParty 0..1
SellerSupplierParty 0..1
DeliveryCustomerParty 1..1
DespatchSupplierParty 1..1
... and maybe that we should also update their descriptions ...
something like:
BuyerCustomerParty: Information about the Buyer Party. This
element is
present only if the Buyer is not the same of Delivery Party.
SellerSupplierParty 0..1 Information about the Seller Party. This
element is present only if the Buyer is not the same of Despatch
Party.
Also,
I
note that the nonexistent document type "Request for
Catalogue" remains in the table; this may be an oversight on
my
part,
but I cannot find any communication in which I am requested
or
authorized to remove it. Please review the snapshot of the
party
roles table and advise.
Actually we don't have a "Request for Catalogue"document, but we
have a
"Calogue Request" ... maybe that we only should update the
document
name.
Jon
Best regards
Arianna
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ubl-psc-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ubl-psc-help@lists.oasis-open.org
--
---------------------------------------
Arianna Brutti
XML-Lab, ENEA
Via Martiri Di Monte Sole 4
40129 Bologna
Tel. +39 051 6098859
Skype: Cross-Lab
http://www.enea.it
http://www.xml-lab.it
http://www.ubl-italia.org
---------------------------------------
|