RE: Merge og definition review version 4

Dear Peter,

Thank you for calling my attention to the particular rows in which you found a ? in Jons column.

I am uncertain what file Tim provided you and if it contained TSC entries.

However, I have reviewed those rows in the last TSC submission (ProposedFinalCommonlit-edit for Transport20121214) and found that the definition for your row 920 was not in column J. (it was in col I). I have corrected that in the attached that represents the full TSC definition submission (TSC’s row 393). As for the other rows, I have confirmed that there is a proposed definition in Col J for each of the other rows you identified.

Regards,

Andy

From: Peter L. Borresen [mailto:plb@ebConnect.dk]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 1:10 PM
To: 'G. Ken Holman'
Cc: ubl-psc@lists.oasis-open.org; 'Andrew M Schoka'
Subject: Merge og definition review version 4

Dear Ken

I have merged the spreadsheet with the input I got from Tim today. I have included to comments on the 10 rows that Kees pointed out. There are still missing definition about TSC issues in the following rows:

888

908

920

1678

1717

1798

1799

2089

2213

Best regards and good luck

Peter

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.2890 / Virus Database: 2638/6032 - Release Date: 01/14/13

ubl-psc message