Re: [ubl-sbsc] Revised candidate XPath files for SBS

["G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>]

At 2005-05-31 12:00 +0100, Stephen Green wrote:
>I found that the stylesheets still have the RelaxNG namespace documents 
>and this is updated to the XSD namespace in the instances.

Thanks for bringing this to my attention ... I had fixed it last night and 
then uploaded the wrong ZIP file.  Based on the answer below I'll upload a 
new collection with the changed stylesheet.

>Secondly I think we have to have, say,
>
><XPath xmlns="urn:oasis:names:tc:ubl:schema:XPath-1.0"
>id="urn:oasis:names:tc:ubl:xpath:DespatchAdvice-1.0:sbs-1.0"
>xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
>xsi:schemaLocation="urn:oasis:names:tc:ubl:schema:XPath-1.0 xpath.xsd">
>
>in the top level element, associating the instance with the schema.

I'm not in favour of doing this ... the schema tools I use do validation 
without the presence of this, and I'm of the opinion that validation is 
something you do outside the instance, not inside the instance.

And, is this necessary to work with the files?  If not, then I think we 
should be biasing the files *not* to be edited, since they are synthesized 
from our control files and really shouldn't be changed.

So, I can change them, but I don't think we should.  What are the arguments 
for including this change?

. . . . . . . . Ken

--
World-wide on-site corporate, govt. & user group XML/XSL training.
G. Ken Holman                 mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com
Crane Softwrights Ltd.          http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/
Box 266, Kars, Ontario CANADA K0A-2E0    +1(613)489-0999 (F:-0995)
Male Breast Cancer Awareness  http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/bc
Legal business disclaimers:  http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal