[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-security] UBL Profile for XML Digital Signatures and XAdES implementation V.01
Hi Andrea, The point is providing for both enveloped and detached signature, not just enveloped. I would suggest a new table of contents for section3: 3 XML Digital Signature of UBL Documents 3.1 Requirements for Digital Signature in UBL 3.2 Enveloped Digital Signature 3.2.1 XML Signature method 3.2.2 Use of UBL cac:Signature element 3.2.3 Specific signature verification controls 3.3 Detached Digital Signature 3.3.1 XML Signature method comment: No specific method for UBL when creating detached signatures 3.3.2 Use of UBL cac:Signature element How the detached file can be referred from the ExternalReference/URI 3.3.3 Specific signature verification controls As required... I think this is another way to create valid signatures for UBL messages so I think we should identify this possibility in our report. Regards, Oriol El 01/10/2009, a las 17:12, Andrea Caccia escribiķ: > It seems interesting. > Can you explain better the scenario? > You mean also in this case inserting the signature in an UBL > extension or > how the message and related signature can be tied together? > > Regards, > Andrea > > > -------- > This message is sent to one or more specific recipient. If you are > not the > intended recipient, please notify the sender and delete this message. > -------- > Questo messaggio č inviato a specifici destinatari. Se non siete i > destinatari, siete pregati di informare il mittente e cancellare > questo > Messaggio. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Oriol Bausā [mailto:ORIOL@INVINET.ORG] > Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 9:15 AM > To: ubl-security@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: Re: [ubl-security] UBL Profile for XML Digital Signatures > and XAdES > implementation V.01 > > Dear all, > > I've been thinking on the UBL Profile for XML Digital Signatures > document and I think there is an improvement we can consider to add. > The point is that we have covered enveloped digital signatures inside > UBL Extensions. My point now is that we could also easily provide for > Detached Signatures with a little effort. > > What do you think about this? > > Regards, Oriol > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]