[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-security] Revision of Draft 11 of the UBL Digital SignatureProfile for review
Thank you, Andrea. Attached is a revised draft. If no further comments are received within the next week (ending COB 5 May), I'll consider it approved by the subcommittee. Thanks to everyone for all their fine work on this. Jon Andrea Caccia wrote: > This is to inform that ASiC has been published today and is available at this URL: http://pda.etsi.org/exchangefolder/ts_102918v010101p.pdf > Andrea > > Il giorno 26/apr/2011, alle ore 23.54, Andrea Caccia ha scritto: > >> It's fine for me, thanks. >> As soon as ASiC will be published I'll keep you informed and send the URL to update the document. >> >> Andrea >> >> >> Il giorno 26/apr/2011, alle ore 22.29, Jon Bosak ha scritto: >> >>> [Re-sending this message under a corrected subject header] >>> >>> Andrea Caccia wrote: >>>> Page 5: XAdES contains several modules that permit various levels of security, such as non-repudiation with timestamps and long-term signature verification >>>> --> XAdES contains several modules that permit various levels of security, such as content commitment and non-repudiation enforcement with timestamps and long-term signature verification >>> Done. >>> >>>> Page 11: Non-repudiation (or content commitment): the document signer cannot deny ... >>>> --> Non-repudiation / content commitment: the document signer cannot deny… >>> I think we're trying to say that both terms refer to the same thing, so >>> I would suggest: >>> >>> <para>Non-repudiation (content commitment): the document >>> signer cannot deny its involvement in creating and/or >>> approving the document (depending on the context and signer >>> role).</para> >>> >>>> Page 13: XAdES-T, where a timestamp is added to enforce non-repudiation and as a proof of anteriority. This envelope allows ascertaining the validity of a signature in case the signer certificate is later revoked; >>>> --> XAdES-T, where a timestamp is added to enforce content commitment and as a proof of anteriority. This envelope allows ascertaining the validity of a signature in case the signer certificate is later revoked; >>> Here I would suggest: >>> >>> <para><emphasis role="bold">XAdES-T</emphasis>, where a >>> timestamp is added to enforce content commitment >>> (non-repudiation) and as a proof of anteriority. This >>> envelope allows ascertaining the validity of a signature in >>> case the signer certificate is later revoked;</para> >>> >>>> Page 13: Business requirements. A digital signature can reduce the risks associated with a business transaction (e.g., non-repudiation of a commercial order, proof-of-origin and integrity of an invoice)... >>>> --> Business requirements. A digital signature can reduce the risks associated with a business transaction (e.g., content commitment of a commercial order, proof-of-origin and integrity of an invoice)… >>> Done. >>> >>> Results are attached. >>> >>>> I please ask Jon to apply these changes (after checking English >>> ) >>>> while thanking him for his patience. >>> It is my pleasure to play some role in your work, Andrea. Please let me >>> know when the ASiC URL becomes available. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Jon >>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that >> generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: >> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]