[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Question about the Dsig Profile as a separate deliverable
Hello UBL Security Subcommittee, As we begin to finish UBL 2.1, an editorial question has arisen with regard to the Digital Signature Profile that you produced last year. In the first two public review cycles, the Profile, formatted as an independent specification, has been included in the review package (in the doc subdirectory). But from an editorial point of view, it would be better either to publish the Profile as a separate deliverable (i.e., make it a Committee Specification) or to incorporate the material into the UBL 2.1 specification itself. Incorporating it into the main UBL 2.1 document would make relevant information easier to find. Before we come to a decision on this, we need to know whether members of the Security Subcommittee have an opinion regarding the need to publish the Profile as a separate document. If there is such a need, then of course that will decide the issue. Please consider this question and let us know what you think. Best regards, Jon Bosak Chair, OASIS UBL TC
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]