[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: question on open alignment issues
Hi, From original F2F report, the UBL-CoreComponentTypes Issue #2 was: The order of the supplementary components for "Code. Type" and "Identifier. Type" should be aligned with the one used in the CCT schema and in CCTS 2.01. But I am seeing that neither schema nor ss are in CCTS order for BinaryObjectType. Should this be on the list to be fixed as well? BTW, Mark's comment on this is that there is no normative order for attributes. So, I assume we are just doing this for the sake of simplifying the tools work. Is this right, or do you see some other reason for having them in the order shown in CCTS? Thanks, Anne
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]