Subject: UBL and TBG3 collaboration was... Re: Are either of you planningto attend the UBL Symposium in Denmark?
Firstly I agree that we need a specific plan with deliverables and
targets. I will talk about this with Kama when we meet in 2 weeks and
perhaps we can proposed some activiites for your consideration. This
seems to have worked well with our collaboration with TBG1.|
It is unfortunate that we have disconnected meeting schedules as these intial issues are best dealt with more interactively. It transpires that I may have some time in Paris (maybe December 1,2 and 3). So perhaps we could try and meet up informally there and try to finalize a workplan? Let me know if this is reasonable and I will make firmer plans.
PS. I should point out that we are not talking about something called "UBL 3.0". The plan with CEFACT is that there will not be a UBL 3.0 but rather a common integrated suite of CEFACT XML documents. It may be that these are a profile (or implementation) of the more generic concepts that TBG3 are managing but in any case i personally suspect it will not be called UBL 3.0. Of course, it will be an upgrade path from UBL 2.0 but it may be more appropriate to call this the "next generation" of XML document schemas for transport.
Henk van Maaren wrote:
-- regards tim mcgrath phone: +618 93352228 postal: po box 1289 fremantle western australia 6160 web: http://www.portcomm.com.au/tmcgrath