OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ubl-tsc message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [ubl-tsc] Minutes of Meeting - Thursday, 7 December 2006


Tim,

I’ve gone thru a bit more on the sample Waybill xml instance. Have additional comments, as follow:

 

  1. TransportHandlingUnit.TotalGoodsItemQuantity = 10 (this should be correct)
  2. TransportHandlingUnit.TotalPackageQuantity = 10 (should this be 1, I believe there is only 1 package, and that package has 10 quantity)
  3. TransportHandlingUnit.ActualPackage.Quantity = 10 (this should be correct)
  4. Maybe it would be good to mention the TransportEquipment used to transport the goods.  

 

Rgds

Kama

 


From: Tim McGrath [mailto:tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au]
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 9:38 AM
To: Kama, Kamarudin Bin Tambi
Cc: ubl-tsc@lists.oasis-open.org; Eric Tesoro; Michael.Onder@dot.gov; ralph.ho@tradelink.com.hk
Subject: Re: [ubl-tsc] Minutes of Meeting - Thursday, 7 December 2006

 

we can talk through this on today's call, but here are my first reactions...

Kama, Kamarudin Bin Tambi wrote:

Hi Tim,

Have gone thru the sample waybill xml instance. Just a couple of queries/clarification.

 

1. This is an air waybill

yes

2. Final delivery transport service is 'pier-to-pier'. Shouldn't it be like in the Excel file for the common library, which mentions 'pier-to-door'. Also is ‘pier’ correct, since we’re shipping the goods by air?

pier-to-pier is legitimate but as you say probably not for air freight.  the original document was sea freight but i changed it to airfreight  to support the status documents andy is working on.  however i did not really think it through well enough.  so i suggest we rethink the shipment stages.

3. Transport mode type refers to the mode of transport. The value of 3 as per un/ece rec 16 in section 3.4 is the classifier code for location, refers to the road terminal. Are we using the correct un/ece rec?

well spotted!  it was meant to say un/ece recommendation 19 (Modes of Transport).

4. Shipment stage has land and air, goods end at airport and not the final destination. Is this correct?.

yes, i wanted to show that the consignee was responsible for final delivery  but this may be too complex and lets make it simpler and ship door-to-door.

 

I’ll go thru it further and send more feedback, if any.

 

Rgds

Kama

 


From: Tim McGrath [mailto:tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au]
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 6:49 AM
To: Kama, Kamarudin Bin Tambi
Cc: ubl-tsc@lists.oasis-open.org; Eric Tesoro; Michael.Onder@dot.gov; ralph.ho@tradelink.com.hk
Subject: Re: [ubl-tsc] Minutes of Meeting - Thursday, 7 December 2006

 

As discussed here is the updated Waybill document.  I also included the stylesheets from ken, so if you save these all into the directory that contains the waybill schema you should be able to view the layout as a table.  i use XMLSpy and the XSL layout option.

Kama, Kamarudin Bin Tambi wrote:


- Tim will update the waybill doc & send to all




-- 
regards
tim mcgrath
phone: +618 93352228  
postal: po box 1289   fremantle    western australia 6160
web: http://www.portcomm.com.au/tmcgrath
 



 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.15.16/582 - Release Date: 11/12/2006
 
  



-- 
regards
tim mcgrath
phone: +618 93352228  
postal: po box 1289   fremantle    western australia 6160
web: http://www.portcomm.com.au/tmcgrath


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]