[Fwd: Re: [Fwd: [ubl-tsc] BITS posted]]

[Tim McGrath <tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au>]

Here is the reponse I received from Stephen.

-------- Original Message --------

Subject:	Re: [Fwd: [ubl-tsc] BITS posted]
Date:	Mon, 18 Dec 2006 03:29:48 -0700
From:	stephen.green@systml.co.uk
To:	Tim McGrath <tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au>
CC:	Sacha Schlegel <Sacha.Schlegel@HavanaWave.com>
References:	<45838C99.9070907@portcomm.com.au>

Hi Tim,

Thanks for something to occupy me in the spare time over the holiday :-)

I'll copy Sacha in on this as he might be available to turn the handle to
create some CPPA templates too, as with the UBP. Should it just be called
BITS?

I'm * extremely * glad to see TSC doing this and filling the gap. I'll do my
best to help.

All the best and have a good holiday

Steve

Quoting Tim McGrath <tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au>:

> I have a small favour to ask (in fact two) - if you are available to
> look at this.
>
> I am not sure if you are aware of the UBL deliverable we refer to as
> BITS (see below)?
>
> The document instances we are using are based on those you created for
> the SBS for UBL version 2.0.  We just made the supplier based in the
> USA.
>
> Firstly, I would be grateful if you could have a quick look at the
> document mentioned below and also the samples we are working on (see
> attached) and give your opinion as to the business case and the
> informaion we are using.  We also intend to create a Despatch Advice
> and Invoice (again based on your examples), so any guidance would be
> appreciated.
>
> Secondly, it would be great if we could also develop a BPSS (like a
> UBP) for this scenario.  What do you think?
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: 	[ubl-tsc] BITS posted
> Date: 	Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:01:09 -0500
> From: 	Andrew Schoka <AMSchoka@comcast.net>
> To: 	<ubl@lists.oasis-open.org>, <ubl-tsc@lists.oasis-open.org>,
> <ubl-psc@lists.oasis-open.org>
> CC: 	Mike Onder <Michael.Onder@fhwa.dot.gov>, David Fitzpatrick
> <fitzpatrick_david@bah.com>
>
>
>
> Dear UBLers,
>
> As a followup to our worksession in Singapore I took the action to
> clean up a first draft of the UBL Basic International Trade Scenario
> document which we were working on. I have posted this draft at the link
> given below and look forward to some constructive discussions that will
> make this document useful to those implementing UBL 2.0. As stated in
> the introduction:
>
>
>
> This document describes the business scenario related to the UBL Basic
> International Trade process based on UBL 2.0 business documents. The
> document is provided to demonstrate a basic, and therefore theoretical,
> use of UBL document exchanges. It does not imply these are the primary
> or the required uses.
>
>
>
> I have included the TC, TSC and PSC on this announcement because I feel
> this document needs the benefit of expertise from all the groups. I
> hope that this can become a topic of discussion in upcoming telecons;
> it already is on the TSC telecom agenda.
>
>
>
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=21424
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Andy Schoka
>
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.15.11/575 - Release Date:
> 12/6/2006 12:22 PM
>
>
> -- 
> regards
> tim mcgrath
> phone: +618 93352228  postal: po box 1289   fremantle    western
> australia 6160
> web: http://www.portcomm.com.au/tmcgrath




-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.15.23/591 - Release Date: 17/12/2006

-- 
regards
tim mcgrath
phone: +618 93352228  
postal: po box 1289   fremantle    western australia 6160
web: http://www.portcomm.com.au/tmcgrath