[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [Fwd: Re: Shipment and Consignment for Danish Requirement] (on behalfof Flemming)
Forwarded on behalf of Flemming. -- regards tim mcgrath phone: +618 93352228 postal: po box 1289 fremantle western australia 6160 web: http://www.portcomm.com.au/tmcgrath
--- Begin Message ---
- From: Flemming Møller Hansen <fmh@progrator.com>
- To: Tim McGrath <tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au>
- Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 21:30:13 +0200
Hi Tim! I enclose my comments to your draft for Shipment and Consignment. The major part of my comments are dealing with information, which from the danish requirements/proposals point of view belong to a Consignment not to a Shipment. There is also a few items I have to investigate further before you can get my answer: Notice: We have decided only to deal with a single shipment with multiple consignments. The TBG2/3 model operates with multiple shipments and multiple consignments. May be we need to clarify the definitions (Shipment/Consigment) before we continue? Who have the correct definitions available? (See attached file: Comments to TIM.xls) Best regards/ Med venlig hilsen PROGRATOR Flemming Møller Hansen eBusiness Consultant ==================================================== EDI & Business Integration MACH Aps, Blokken 9, 3460 Birkerød Tlf: 4582 1600, Direkte: 4590 2037 Fax: 4582 1644, Mobil: 2120 1965 http://www.progrator.dk =====================================================?ISO-8859-1?Q?Comments_to_TIM=2Exls?=
No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.2/890 - Release Date: 7/07/2007 3:26 PM--- End Message ---
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]