[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: TSC Action Item FollowUp
Dear TSC members, During our last telecon we ran out of time to discuss an
action that we had been given from the TC. The action item from the TC is as
follows: UPDATE PACKAGE: JPLSC COMMENTS ACTION (12/18): AS to get answer from
TSC regarding JPLSC comment 25. JPLSC comment 25 to the 2.0 update package is as
follows:
I think it is appropriate that there be consistency
across the various documents when the same ASBIEs are identified and their
definitions used. With regard to the definition of Shipment, I believe that we
have previously had an email exchange and a telecon discussion regarding an
appropriate definition. Based upon a contribution by •
SHIPMENT The arrangements necessary for an identifiable
collection of one or more goods items to be transported between the original
consignor and the ultimate consignee. This information represents what is
required, that is a “logical” or contractual view. A shipment can
be transported in different consignments (eg split for logistical purposes). I propose that this be the resolution of the action
item. If I don’t receive a response within 7 days, I will presume
concurrence. Jon will then use this definition wherever the definition of
shipment is used. Regards, Andy Schoka Acting Chair TSC No virus found in this outgoing message. |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]