Subject: TSC Action Item FollowUp
Dear TSC members,
During our last telecon we ran out of time to discuss an action that we had been given from the TC. The action item from the TC is as follows:
UPDATE PACKAGE: JPLSC COMMENTS
ACTION (12/18): AS to get answer from TSC regarding JPLSC
JPLSC comment 25 to the 2.0 update package is as follows:
I think it is appropriate that there be consistency
across the various documents when the same ASBIEs are identified and their
definitions used. With regard to the definition of Shipment, I believe that we
have previously had an email exchange and a telecon discussion regarding an
appropriate definition. Based upon a contribution by
The arrangements necessary for an identifiable collection of one or more goods items to be transported between the original consignor and the ultimate consignee. This information represents what is required, that is a “logical” or contractual view. A shipment can be transported in different consignments (eg split for logistical purposes).
I propose that this be the resolution of the action item. If I don’t receive a response within 7 days, I will presume concurrence. Jon will then use this definition wherever the definition of shipment is used.
Acting Chair TSC
No virus found in this outgoing message.